And another review
carmen
[info]mprmike
Here's the review from the Silicon Valley Metro, the first review of the cast that opened Sunday.

I'm not sure what these critics are expecting from the singer playing the title role. It would appear that they want Agnes Baltsa at the height of her fame - and this from an opera company that is known for providing a learning environment for young opera singers toward the beginning of their careers. But whatever. The review is largely positive, and that's a good thing.

Ah, a good one...
carmen
[info]mprmike
You have to get through ten whole paragraphs of plot summary, but eventually there's a positive review of Carmen from the San Francisco Music Journal (a site I'd never heard of before). There are also a few nice photos, including the one reproduced below, which shows off our costumes and lighting quite nicely. And you can see me, looking surprised (apparently) at Escamillo's exploits.


In case we needed more proof that art is subjective
Springfield
[info]mprmike
The "Habanera" in Act I — a tune that has seeped into the consciousness of the majority of people on Earth — should be held in reserve, like tango. So on the edge of passion, in other words, that it becomes excruciating.

But Gouverneur, who has a marvelously creamy, alabaster voice, held it too much in reserve. There was scarcely any sexual ignition.

- Richard Scheinin, San Jose Mercury


A statuesque, doe-eyed beauty who bears a passing resemblance to the young Ava Gardner, Gouverneur certainly has the makings of a strong Carmen. Saturday, she introduced a large, velvety mezzo voice marked by rich, dusky tones and the high extensions that the role demands. If the voice occasionally emerged a little occluded in the lower reaches of her range, Gouverneur, for the most part, sounded voluptuous; the “Habanera” was sung with plush tone and smooth line that augured well for the rest of the evening.

- Georgia Rowe, San Francisco Classical Voice


Opposite Gouverneur, as Don Jose, the simple soldier she charms and seduces to no good end, was tenor Alexander Boyer. He sang with beautiful buoyancy and passion (the "Flower Song" in Act II was one of numerous highlights), while navigating his character's change from an Average Joe conformist to a stalker and killer of the woman he supposedly loves.

- Scheinin


As her Don José, Alexander Boyer also struggled to achieve verisimilitude. Despite a tendency to lose tone at full volume, the tenor’s warm, elegant singing was a decided asset (the “Flower Song” was both smooth and ardent), but he, too, seemed still in search of a character, and his scenes with Gouverneur had an awkwardly muted quality.

- Rowe


But most passionate of all, the real star of the show, was soprano Rebecca Davis, as Micaela, the good girl from Don Jose's hometown — and the woman he should be courting. Saturday, Davis had it all: lustrous colors, secure top-to-bottom singing with penetrating power and true operatic emotion. She was arresting.

- Scheinin


Rebecca Davis was simply miscast as Micaela, Don José’s village sweetheart. The soprano, who sang a lovely Fiordiligi for this company earlier in the season, returned Saturday sounding strained. Her Act 1 duet with Boyer lacked the requisite delicacy, and her scene in the Gypsy camp was unfocused and acidic.

- Rowe


[A]ll the choruses could sing with more volume and punch

- Scheinin


The chorus, under the direction of John Kendall Bailey, sounded well-rehearsed and vibrant

- Rowe

These two critics were at the same performance.

Carmen! Sur tes pas nous nous pressons tous!
carmen
[info]mprmike
Well, the first (and most important) Carmen review is in, from the San Jose Mercury. Unfortunately, it's not quite the rave I was hoping for. Lots of nice comments, but it's hard to get over that he didn't like the portrayal of the lead character. And in an opera like Carmen, in which the chorus hardly ever leaves the stage, the most he can say is that we "could sing with more volume and punch"? Thanks. Of course we're also all those ogling soldiers and gypsies he liked so much.

Anyway. I'm not really pleased, overall. The Metro review will be out on Wednesday afternoon, and I believe that critic came yesterday, so he saw the second cast. Maybe we'll get something better.

Better late than never?
Pan, Bat Boy
[info]mprmike
A week and a half after we closed, the Talkin' Broadway review of Bat Boy is up (second review on the page - scroll down).

It's a good one. I wish it had been posted while we were still running, but such is life.

All Bat Boy, all the time!
Pan, Bat Boy
[info]mprmike
I bet people can't wait for me to start talking about Carmen! (First rehearsal was last night.)

Anyway. What is this? Review? News report? Some weird hybrid of the two? I guess when your newspaper has a circulation of, like, 100 and you're the publishers, you can do whatever you want.

Another Bat Boy Review
Pan, Bat Boy
[info]mprmike
This one is from the Contra Costa Times. It's a good one, and I'll take it. But I'm not sure what to make of the first half of the sentence "Michael Rhone unmistakably has fun with his multiple roles, and his voice adds richness to many musical numbers." "You looked like you were having so much fun up there" is one of the things you say when you didn't like somebody's performance!

Meanwhile we've got lots of seats left to fill for the next two weekends (particularly the matinees). So (for those who live in the area), come see it and/or tell your friends! Not that we should put too much stock in this, but as of now we're the number 1 show on Artsopolis, with an average rating of 4.7 stars.

And another
Pan, Bat Boy
[info]mprmike
This one from the... um... Gilroy Dispatch. Who knew Gilroy had a paper? Anyway, it's not a high profile review and it's not well written, but it's a positive review. I'll take it!

Bat Boy Review #1
Pan, Bat Boy
[info]mprmike
Y'all know me, I can't resist posting my reviews (good, bad, and ugly). The first review, from the Silicon Valley Metro is in.

It's a great review, and a love letter to our Bat Boy, Robert Brewer. I'll pull out one relevant paragraph:

Ironically, the smashing success of this production may have been determined by a last-minute twist of fate that must have seemed disastrous at the time. In February, announced lead Andrew Ceglio had to pull out of the production for personal reasons, and Bay Area actor Robert Brewer stepped into the role of Bat Boy. Nothing against Ceglio, but Brewer is simply incredible.
The whole thing makes me very happy.

Elixir Review #3
elixir
[info]mprmike
This one's from the Metro, and it's another good one. Especially that last phrase, which reads "cheers once again for David Kurtenbach's chorus whose acting skills seem to get better with each production" (although credit for the chorus's acting should go to stage director Dianna Schuster).

Elixir Review #2
elixir
[info]mprmike
Here's our second review, from San Francisco Classical Voice. Although the writer takes an overly academic (or psuedo-academic) tone (and an unnecessary political jab that seems the equivalent of kicking someone when he's down), it's still a positive review.

As for the important stuff (i.e., ME), I'm in two of the pictures. You can see my back on the left side of the second picture, and most of my body (face obscured by another person's elbow) second from right in the third picture. It's like I'm in the witness protection program.

EDIT: Thanks to Patty for pointing out the following sentence in the review: "The Opera San José chorus seems to be getting stronger and stronger with each new production." Hooray!

Elixir Review #1
elixir
[info]mprmike
We opened The Elixir of Love this weekend, and both performances went really well. They were also very well-received by the audiences, which is nice. Sadly, I'm fighting off a cold and my voice pretty much sucks right now. Thank goodness I can hide in the chorus.

But despite my lack of vocal contribution (or is that because of it?) we got a good review in the Mercury. I'm very glad he enjoyed it. Now I hope we'll sell some tickets...

And the last ones. Finally!
pajama game
[info]mprmike
Sorry, Matthew...

First, here's the Talkin' Broadway review of The Pajama Game (scroll down).

And then finally, the AisleSay.com review.

Three more performances!

Still another Pajama Game review
pajama game
[info]mprmike
I've made some critical comments about Keith Kreitman before, but I gotta say, this is one of his better reviews. :-)

In all seriousness, it's the first review of his I can remember reading that isn't just a plot summary. It's not a great example of theatrical criticism, but at least he had something to say. And of course I'm happy that it's a rave.

Too bad there are still reviews coming in when we only have four performances left. I'm still waiting on the Talkin' Broadway review (which often gets posted after shows close) and the AisleSay.com review (which has been written for weeks but the site hasn't been updated since before we opened).

And the reviews kept rolling in
pajama game
[info]mprmike
Palo Alto Weekly. Hey! This one mentions me! Oh... it's a criticism. Nevermind, nothing to see here...

A few more Pajama Game reviews
pajama game
[info]mprmike
First, the Silicon Valley Metro. Mixed.

And a couple of blog reviews from For All Events (a website I'd never heard of). Both pretty good.

I've seen the text of the review from AisleSay.com (and it's a good one), but it hasn't been posted yet so I'll wait on that one.

Pajama Game Review
pajama game
[info]mprmike
Our first review is out, and, well... does anyone else think it sounds incomplete? Like they literally didn't post the entire thing? She mentions what she likes, and alludes to not liking other aspects of the show, but never gets more specific than that. Anyway, it's just weird.

Flute Review #4
Magic Flute
[info]mprmike
Unless the Mercury comes back to review the cast they missed (entirely possible), this, from the Milpitas Post is probably the final review.

Ah, the Milpitas Post. God bless him for faithfully reviewing our shows, but I always wonder if anyone actually reads that paper. Another positive review, though.

I really wish I could see the show. I've seen portions of it from the house, but only during tech, so not with the finalized lighting and costumes (and no makeup or wigs). I had my doubts that the production was going to look good, but apparently it really does. I'd love to see what the audiences are seeing. Oh well.

Flute review #3
Magic Flute
[info]mprmike
The review from the Metro is in. Weird review, especially at the end when he just starts putting in random sentences about different members of the production team. It's a bit more mixed than the Mercury, but still a positive review. I'll take it.

I like that he kinda called us on the similarities to Julie Taymor's production at the Met. Because it's absolutely clear that our production was influenced by hers, while the Mercury praised the director for his Asian influences, as if she hadn't done the same thing last year (in a production that was televised nationally).

Flute Review #2
Magic Flute
[info]mprmike
Another review, this one from San Francisco Classical Voice. She... liked it? Kinda? Honestly, it's hard to tell. This one reviews the opening night cast.

Home